H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Bernarda Pera holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernarda Pera won the 2023 Hobart International second round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernarda Pera | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Laura Siegemund | Match data | Feb 16, 2024 | Q1 | Dubai Tennis Championships | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Bernarda Pera | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | Laura Siegemund | Match data | Jan 12, 2023* | R16 | Hobart International | WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #102 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,852 | 145 | 154 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 96 | 126 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #51 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #125 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2015 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2016 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2023 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 29 | 2017 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2019 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 66 | 83 | 149 | 44.3% | 69 | 56 | 125 | 55.2% | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | — | 44 | 77 | 121 | 36.4% | 47 | 36 | 83 | 56.6% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 213/222 of Bernarda Pera's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 2010 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 73.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 12.5% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 47.5% | 2017 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 55.7% | 53.7% | 32.6% | 30.8% | 40.0% | 44.3% | 50.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 25/26 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 60.4% | 64.4% | 47.6% | 55.8% | 46.9% | 57.8% | 42.1% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30/31 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 61.8% | 66.4% | 48.8% | 58.7% | 51.6% | 59.7% | 42.8% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15/15 | 3.5 | 6.7 | 58.9% | 65.8% | 38.0% | 52.4% | 46.1% | 54.5% | 41.2% |
| 26 | 2014 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 63.6% | 61.4% | 44.0% | 61.0% | 54.8% | 55.3% | 49.0% | 2021 | 31/31 | 2.6 | 5.6 | 60.3% | 61.5% | 44.2% | 55.3% | 47.7% | 54.7% | 44.1% |
| 27 | 2015 | 8/12 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 70.8% | 58.6% | 50.3% | 47.6% | 51.3% | 55.8% | 47.8% | 2022 | 25/25 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 62.7% | 66.9% | 46.2% | 53.1% | 49.5% | 59.5% | 45.1% |
| 28 | 2016 | 43/48 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 71.0% | 59.9% | 46.9% | 51.7% | 50.6% | 56.1% | 46.0% | 2023 | 40/40 | 3.7 | 5.6 | 62.4% | 61.8% | 45.2% | 54.8% | 49.4% | 55.6% | 41.5% |
| 29 | 2017 | 24/25 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 69.0% | 58.7% | 42.8% | 57.5% | 45.1% | 53.7% | 46.8% | 2024 | 31/31 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 60.2% | 63.7% | 42.2% | 59.0% | 46.1% | 55.4% | 41.1% |
| 30 | 2018 | 19/20 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 66.0% | 59.6% | 47.9% | 49.6% | 54.3% | 55.6% | 45.3% | 2025 | 15/22 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 61.4% | 64.2% | 44.7% | 58.0% | 41.9% | 56.5% | 37.8% |
| 31 | 2019 | 35/35 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 68.9% | 59.9% | 48.7% | 53.5% | 42.0% | 56.5% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 19/19 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 68.5% | 61.3% | 46.8% | 52.7% | 43.6% | 56.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 20/22 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 70.1% | 56.1% | 49.0% | 51.7% | 47.4% | 53.9% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 70.1% | 58.4% | 45.6% | 50.7% | 39.2% | 54.8% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 23/24 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 75.3% | 62.5% | 44.7% | 59.6% | 49.4% | 58.0% | 42.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 32/34 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 73.1% | 56.6% | 44.4% | 51.6% | 50.4% | 53.3% | 47.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 21/28 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 74.1% | 60.5% | 42.3% | 54.9% | 43.0% | 55.6% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 19/20 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 75.0% | 59.2% | 46.8% | 52.5% | 41.4% | 56.1% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 277/301 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 71.0% | 59.3% | 46.1% | 53.1% | 46.9% | 55.4% | 44.1% | — | 213/222 | 3.4 | 5.1 | 61.1% | 64.0% | 44.9% | 55.9% | 47.9% | 56.7% | 42.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | 2010 | 1483 | 96.8 | -2.49 | -3.75 | 0.712 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2017 | 1515 | 107.6 | +2.02 | -2.32 | 0.898 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1638 | 128.8 | +0.83 | +0.08 | 0.998 | 50.0% | -32 | +7 | — | 50.8% | -0.16 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.0 | +0.74 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1689 | 125.8 | +2.00 | +0.03 | 1.060 | 51.5% | -57 | +19 | -78 | 49.3% | +0.49 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–9 (10%) | 94.5 | +0.54 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1668 | 133.5 | -1.33 | -0.42 | 0.907 | 48.0% | -7 | +1 | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.6 | -1.35 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1495 | 114.5 | +1.56 | +0.48 | 1.094 | 52.5% | — | +47 | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.44 | 2021 | 1628 | 127.6 | -0.76 | +0.63 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -20 | +57 | — | 40.8% | -0.40 | 3–11 (21%) | 2–4 (33%) | 91.2 | -0.35 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1530 | 113.4 | -1.13 | +2.65 | 1.082 | 51.4% | +25 | 0 | — | 44.0% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.0 | -0.28 | 2022 | 1755 | 137.7 | +1.79 | +1.65 | 1.114 | 52.2% | -115 | +194 | — | 61.1% | +0.89 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | -1.74 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1747 | 132.7 | +0.58 | +2.35 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -100 | +75 | -189 | 56.9% | +0.36 | 11–4 (73%) | 3–5 (38%) | 106.8 | -0.49 | 2023 | 1688 | 128.1 | -0.35 | -1.25 | 0.936 | 48.8% | -60 | +196 | -214 | 46.3% | -0.42 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–6 (57%) | 103.1 | +0.43 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1796 | 129.1 | -1.81 | +3.46 | 1.011 | 50.2% | -247 | +119 | — | 53.3% | +0.10 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 94.0 | -1.87 | 2024 | 1764 | 134.0 | -0.69 | -1.42 | 0.922 | 48.2% | -26 | +78 | -94 | 42.5% | -0.66 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -0.98 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1693 | 118.6 | -0.34 | +1.50 | 1.020 | 50.5% | -147 | +85 | — | 48.7% | +0.23 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -1.08 | 2025 | 1655 | 126.5 | -0.58 | -3.69 | 0.870 | 47.7% | +15 | +76 | -55 | 36.0% | -0.64 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | 93.8 | -0.84 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1667 | 125.7 | +0.15 | -0.92 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -73 | +57 | — | 43.2% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.0 | -0.71 | 2026 | 1639 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1789 | 142.4 | +0.10 | +1.20 | 1.003 | 50.0% | -78 | +22 | — | 52.3% | +0.30 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1732 | 132.3 | -1.05 | -1.02 | 0.881 | 47.5% | +5 | +47 | -144 | 40.4% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1655 | 117.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.831 | 46.6% | +18 | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1801 | 135.1 | +1.10 | -0.24 | 1.012 | 50.5% | +3 | — | — | 53.4% | +0.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1740 | 133.5 | -2.46 | +2.44 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +19 | -18 | — | 53.2% | +0.16 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 1804 | 133.6 | -0.54 | +1.20 | 0.998 | 49.8% | -13 | -162 | -31 | 49.2% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.8 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 1749 | 132.0 | +0.15 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -22 | -29 | -39 | 42.9% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.9 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1852 | 137.5 | -0.42 | +1.03 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -45 | +46 | -90 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 55–51 (52%) | 30–46 (39%) | 95.4 | -2.76 | — | 1837 | 134.7 | +0.19 | -0.44 | 0.975 | 49.6% | -37 | +96 | -117 | 46.1% | -0.20 | 32–49 (40%) | 24–36 (40%) | 89.0 | -1.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 26, 2025 | H2H |
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 25, 2024 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |