H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 0-1
Maryna Zanevska holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maryna Zanevska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maryna Zanevska won the 2015 Bastad third round 7-6(8) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2015* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maryna Zanevska | 7-6(8) 3-6 6-2 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Siegemund | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |