H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 0-1

Maryna Zanevska holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maryna Zanevska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maryna Zanevska won the 2015 Bastad round of 32 7-6(8) 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maryna Zanevska
Belgium Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maryna Zanevska #139 7-6(8) 3-6 6-2 Laura Siegemund #123 Match data Jul 16, 2015* R32 Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Maryna Zanevska #1,162 #62 1,015 1,754 29 53 35.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Maryna Zanevska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2013 1–3 25.0% #118 1,476 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 1–6 14.3% #128 1,439 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2015 2–3 40.0% #143 1,454 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2016 0–3 0.0% #122 1,470 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2017 0–8 0.0% #167 1,418 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2018 1–2 33.3% #217 1,463 0 0
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2021 9–2 81.8% #82 1,672 0 1
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2022 10–14 41.7% #81 1,698 0 1
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2023 5–12 29.4% #251 1,579 0 1
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Maryna Zanevska
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 — — — — 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2022 3 6 9 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2023 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — 8 22 30 26.7% 21 25 46 45.7% 0 6 6 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 81/82 of Maryna Zanevska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Maryna Zanevska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 1.3 9.0 54.2% 58.7% 42.1% 59.7% 39.4% 51.1% 40.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 7/7 0.9 5.0 58.4% 58.8% 41.4% 27.9% 43.3% 51.7% 44.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 5/5 0.8 8.2 67.7% 56.8% 41.5% 51.1% 58.9% 51.8% 43.7%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2016 3/3 1.7 6.3 55.0% 57.3% 34.7% 58.5% 36.8% 46.5% 45.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 8/8 1.5 6.1 54.3% 62.0% 33.6% 52.3% 31.8% 48.9% 36.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 3/3 1.0 5.7 61.0% 61.3% 37.5% 29.3% 38.9% 51.8% 44.1%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2021 11/11 1.5 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 49.3% 55.0% 49.0% 60.8% 50.3%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2022 23/24 2.2 4.0 60.7% 63.0% 43.6% 46.8% 56.0% 55.2% 43.7%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2023 17/17 2.4 4.5 59.9% 59.1% 43.1% 47.6% 42.3% 53.0% 42.4%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 81/82 1.8 5.0 59.7% 61.4% 42.3% 47.7% 46.7% 53.7% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Maryna Zanevska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1476 95.3 -2.00 -1.43 0.817 45.9% +33 — — 30.0% -1.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.33
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1440 108.4 -1.87 +0.08 0.919 47.9% +23 +85 — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.25
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1455 100.8 -1.05 -0.33 0.907 47.5% — +65 — 46.2% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.03
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2016 1470 103.4 -1.03 -1.03 0.841 45.9% — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 1–1 — -0.04
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1419 96.1 -4.50 -4.09 0.706 42.6% +22 +44 — 11.1% -2.78 0–2 0–1 — +0.47
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1464 103.5 -1.41 -0.62 0.914 47.7% — +50 — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–0 — +0.24
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2020 1508 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2021 1672 121.4 +1.89 +2.41 1.284 55.4% — +125 — 75.0% +1.79 2–0 1–0 — +0.43
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2022 1699 127.6 -1.33 +1.20 0.975 49.4% -161 +122 -182 45.8% -0.15 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.3 -1.34
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2023 1580 123.8 -3.07 -0.41 0.903 47.7% -40 +115 — 34.2% -0.82 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.7 -0.76
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1754 118.5 -1.63 +0.03 0.940 48.6% -55 +100 -182 39.4% -0.64 7–13 (35%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.