H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Shuai Zhang H2H: 2-1

Laura Siegemund holds a 2–1 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2017 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix first round 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #49 6-2 7-6(4) Shuai Zhang #32 Match data Apr 27, 2017* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Shuai Zhang #23 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Laura Siegemund #31 Match data Jan 2, 2017 R32 Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Laura Siegemund #32 6-2 6-4 Shuai Zhang #50 Match data Aug 10, 2016* R32 Rio de Janeiro Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Shuai Zhang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Shuai Zhang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Shuai Zhang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9%
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2%
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3%
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3%
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4%
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5%
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Shuai Zhang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.