H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 2-0
Laura Siegemund holds a 2–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2020 Doha second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2020* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-3 6-2 | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2014* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 7-5 6-3 | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |