H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Yingying Duan H2H: 0-1
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2017 Miami first round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Siegemund | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |