H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2017 Miami Open first round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data | Mar 23, 2017* | R128 | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #102 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,852 | 145 | 154 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,654 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Siegemund | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #51 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #125 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Laura Siegemund | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2018 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2020 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 66 | 83 | 149 | 44.3% | 69 | 56 | 125 | 55.2% | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | Career | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 85/92 of Yingying Duan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Laura Siegemund | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2010 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 73.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 12.5% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 47.5% | 2012 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 64.1% | 67.9% | 49.1% | 85.0% | 45.8% | 61.7% | 42.0% |
| 2014 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 63.6% | 61.4% | 44.0% | 61.0% | 54.8% | 55.3% | 49.0% | 2013 | 5/5 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 65.5% | 58.9% | 40.6% | 29.4% | 56.0% | 52.3% | 42.5% |
| 2015 | 8/12 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 70.8% | 58.6% | 50.3% | 47.6% | 51.3% | 55.8% | 47.8% | 2014 | 5/7 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 61.4% | 60.9% | 46.0% | 57.6% | 51.7% | 54.9% | 39.8% |
| 2016 | 43/48 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 71.0% | 59.9% | 46.9% | 51.7% | 50.6% | 56.1% | 46.0% | 2015 | 9/13 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 61.2% | 71.3% | 44.9% | 55.4% | 39.5% | 60.8% | 39.4% |
| 2017 | 24/25 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 69.0% | 58.7% | 42.8% | 57.5% | 45.1% | 53.7% | 46.8% | 2016 | 14/15 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 65.4% | 66.2% | 44.5% | 56.6% | 43.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% |
| 2018 | 19/20 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 66.0% | 59.6% | 47.9% | 49.6% | 54.3% | 55.6% | 45.3% | 2017 | 28/28 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 61.1% | 42.7% | 52.1% | 48.3% | 55.1% | 39.7% |
| 2019 | 35/35 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 68.9% | 59.9% | 48.7% | 53.5% | 42.0% | 56.5% | 41.2% | 2018 | 16/16 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 67.8% | 63.8% | 37.4% | 61.2% | 47.4% | 55.7% | 41.0% |
| 2020 | 19/19 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 68.5% | 61.3% | 46.8% | 52.7% | 43.6% | 56.7% | 43.5% | 2019 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 64.4% | 40.2% | 43.6% | 33.0% | 55.4% | 35.6% |
| 2021 | 20/22 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 70.1% | 56.1% | 49.0% | 51.7% | 47.4% | 53.9% | 40.6% | 2020 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 70.4% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 24.5% |
| 2022 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 70.1% | 58.4% | 45.6% | 50.7% | 39.2% | 54.8% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23/24 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 75.3% | 62.5% | 44.7% | 59.6% | 49.4% | 58.0% | 42.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 32/34 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 73.1% | 56.6% | 44.4% | 51.6% | 50.4% | 53.3% | 47.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21/28 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 74.1% | 60.5% | 42.3% | 54.9% | 43.0% | 55.6% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19/20 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 75.0% | 59.2% | 46.8% | 52.5% | 41.4% | 56.1% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 277/301 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 71.0% | 59.3% | 46.1% | 53.1% | 46.9% | 55.4% | 44.1% | Career | 85/92 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 65.7% | 63.7% | 42.3% | 54.3% | 46.1% | 56.4% | 40.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Laura Siegemund | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2010 | 1483 | 96.8 | -2.49 | -3.75 | 0.712 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2012 | 1508 | 106.9 | -0.29 | -0.87 | 1.098 | 51.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 2014 | 1495 | 114.5 | +1.56 | +0.48 | 1.094 | 52.5% | — | +47 | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.44 | 2013 | 1511 | 104.6 | -0.82 | -0.25 | 0.890 | 47.5% | +21 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 |
| 2015 | 1530 | 113.4 | -1.13 | +2.65 | 1.082 | 51.4% | +25 | 0 | — | 44.0% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.0 | -0.28 | 2014 | 1477 | 101.2 | -1.58 | -1.40 | 0.882 | 47.6% | +14 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.69 |
| 2016 | 1747 | 132.7 | +0.58 | +2.35 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -100 | +75 | -189 | 56.9% | +0.36 | 11–4 (73%) | 3–5 (38%) | 106.8 | -0.49 | 2015 | 1517 | 106.8 | +0.96 | -1.58 | 1.004 | 49.9% | -2 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.33 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.5 | +0.60 |
| 2017 | 1796 | 129.1 | -1.81 | +3.46 | 1.011 | 50.2% | -247 | +119 | — | 53.3% | +0.10 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 94.0 | -1.87 | 2016 | 1538 | 108.9 | +0.86 | -0.78 | 1.017 | 50.6% | -26 | — | — | 48.6% | -0.06 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | +1.24 |
| 2018 | 1693 | 118.6 | -0.34 | +1.50 | 1.020 | 50.5% | -147 | +85 | — | 48.7% | +0.23 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -1.08 | 2017 | 1583 | 117.0 | -0.51 | -2.33 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +30 | -93 | -6 | 39.3% | -0.93 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.8 | +0.64 |
| 2019 | 1667 | 125.7 | +0.15 | -0.92 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -73 | +57 | — | 43.2% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.0 | -0.71 | 2018 | 1573 | 127.1 | -0.70 | -1.07 | 0.927 | 48.5% | +3 | — | — | 39.5% | -0.55 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.27 |
| 2020 | 1789 | 142.4 | +0.10 | +1.20 | 1.003 | 50.0% | -78 | +22 | — | 52.3% | +0.30 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -1.05 | 2019 | 1542 | 109.9 | -0.01 | -4.94 | 0.799 | 45.8% | +17 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.67 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.18 |
| 2021 | 1732 | 132.3 | -1.05 | -1.02 | 0.881 | 47.5% | +5 | +47 | -144 | 40.4% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | -0.72 | 2020 | 1533 | 102.9 | +0.45 | -3.00 | 0.551 | 40.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 2022 | 1655 | 117.5 | -0.88 | -0.51 | 0.831 | 46.6% | +18 | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1801 | 135.1 | +1.10 | -0.24 | 1.012 | 50.5% | +3 | — | — | 53.4% | +0.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1740 | 133.5 | -2.46 | +2.44 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +19 | -18 | — | 53.2% | +0.16 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1804 | 133.6 | -0.54 | +1.20 | 0.998 | 49.8% | -13 | -162 | -31 | 49.2% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.8 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1749 | 132.0 | +0.15 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -22 | -29 | -39 | 42.9% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.9 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1852 | 137.5 | -0.42 | +1.03 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -45 | +46 | -90 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 55–51 (52%) | 30–46 (39%) | 95.4 | -2.76 | Career | 1655 | 118.7 | -0.20 | -1.71 | 0.920 | 48.4% | +8 | -93 | -6 | 40.4% | -0.66 | 12–16 (43%) | 11–15 (42%) | 97.2 | +3.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 8, 2020 | H2H |
| Luksika Kumkhum | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 13, 2018 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |