H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Lauren Davis vs Louisa Chirico H2H: 0-1
Louisa Chirico holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louisa Chirico leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Louisa Chirico won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-2 2-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2018 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Louisa Chirico | 6-1 7-6(2) | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Louisa Chirico | 6-2 2-6 8-6 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2016 | Monterrey | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Lauren Davis | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Louisa Chirico | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Louisa Chirico | #382 | #58 | 1,020 | 1,668 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Louisa Chirico | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #111 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #208 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |