H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lauren Davis vs Louisa Chirico H2H: 0-1

Louisa Chirico holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louisa Chirico leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Louisa Chirico won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-2 2-6 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Louisa Chirico
United States Age 30 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Louisa Chirico #260 6-1 7-6(2) Lauren Davis #205 Match data Jul 28, 2018 Q1 Q Washington Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Louisa Chirico #78 6-2 2-6 8-6 Lauren Davis #113 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Lauren Davis #96 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 Louisa Chirico #123 Match data Feb 27, 2016 Q1 Q Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Louisa Chirico #453 #58 1,020 1,651 19 46 29.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lauren Davis Louisa Chirico
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0 2015 3–8 27.3% #111 1,484 0 0
20 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0 2016 11–14 44.0% #68 1,646 0 0
21 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0 2017 2–10 16.7% #208 1,555 0 0
22 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1 2022 1–3 25.0% #163 1,573 0 0
27 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1 2023 0–6 0.0% #266 1,585 0 0
28 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1 2024 0–2 0.0% #172 1,565 0 0
29 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2 2025 2–3 40.0% #176 1,619 0 0
30 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lauren Davis Louisa Chirico
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2016 4 9 13 30.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9% — 9 27 36 25.0% 10 17 27 37.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/325 of Lauren Davis's and 57/66 of Louisa Chirico's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lauren Davis Louisa Chirico
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9% 2015 9/11 1.9 5.0 54.8% 59.5% 47.6% 41.1% 46.6% 54.1% 37.8%
20 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8% 2016 23/26 2.2 4.4 56.3% 60.6% 42.3% 51.4% 51.7% 52.8% 41.8%
21 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7% 2017 10/12 1.2 4.3 60.0% 55.5% 36.2% 51.0% 53.0% 47.0% 39.4%
22 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2% 2022 4/4 1.0 5.0 61.1% 52.9% 33.9% 41.9% 47.9% 45.6% 31.5%
27 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0% 2023 6/6 0.8 5.5 59.5% 56.7% 42.4% 44.7% 28.3% 50.8% 35.8%
28 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7% 2024 2/2 2.0 4.5 58.4% 55.1% 43.7% 48.6% 41.7% 50.0% 36.7%
29 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8% 2025 3/5 2.3 6.3 62.0% 61.2% 38.6% 49.8% 42.4% 53.0% 41.0%
30 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7% — 57/66 1.7 4.8 57.8% 58.4% 41.3% 48.1% 47.5% 51.2% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lauren Davis Louisa Chirico
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03 2015 1484 100.4 -1.54 -1.22 0.824 45.7% +25 +7 — 30.8% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.05
20 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07 2016 1647 125.1 -1.16 +0.15 0.885 47.5% -59 -1 — 42.6% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.75
21 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82 2017 1556 105.3 -4.61 -3.18 0.744 43.3% -15 +36 — 25.0% -1.96 0–2 1–0 — -0.30
22 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31 2018 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90 2021 1494 92.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17 2022 1573 109.0 -2.38 -1.87 0.578 39.3% +7 — — 22.2% -2.89 1–0 1–0 — -0.24
27 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59 2023 1586 114.4 -2.42 -3.39 0.728 43.2% -24 +64 — 7.7% -2.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.24
28 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24 2024 1566 113.9 +0.80 -0.39 0.735 43.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.41
29 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58 2025 1620 105.5 -2.01 -2.02 0.871 47.1% — +89 — 42.9% -0.65 2–2 (50%) — — -0.18
30 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30 2026 1531 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56 — 1651 114.8 -2.02 -1.30 0.802 45.3% -21 +28 — 32.4% -1.30 8–13 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.6 -4.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.