H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Bianca Andreescu H2H: 3-0
Lesia Tsurenko holds a 3–0 lead over Bianca Andreescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2024 Toronto second round 0-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2024* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-1 6-1 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2023* | Hua Hin | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-5 4-0 (ret.) | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Bianca Andreescu | #173 | #4 | 5,331 | 2,042 | 107 | 75 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Bianca Andreescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 35–8 | 81.4% | #5 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #46 | 1,855 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,904 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #95 | 1,780 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #132 | 1,776 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #228 | 1,727 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,712 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |