H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 2-2
Lesia Tsurenko and Garbiñe Muguruza are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2018 Cincinnati third round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2018* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 2-0 (ret.) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 6-4 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2015* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-5 6-1 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |