H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:18 UTC
Leylah Fernandez vs Alycia Parks H2H: 1-2
Alycia Parks holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alycia Parks leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alycia Parks won the 2026 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alycia Parks | 6-4 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Alycia Parks | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alycia Parks | 7-5 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Alycia Parks | #70 | #40 | 1,208 | 1,817 | 51 | 76 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Alycia Parks | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #78 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |