H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2026 Brisbane International second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-1 6-2 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data | Jan 7, 2026 | R32 | Brisbane International | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 7-6(6) | Leylah Fernandez | Match data | Jun 20, 2025 | QF | Nottingham Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Leylah Fernandez | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Feb 12, 2023 | Q2 | Qatar Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Jul 26, 2021* | R64 | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #33 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 152 | 125 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2023 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2024 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #31 | 1,869 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2026 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 2021 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2023 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2026 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 108 | 81 | 189 | 57.1% | 29 | 29 | 58 | 50.0% | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 254/279 of Leylah Fernandez's and 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 57.8% | 73.9% | 52.3% | 61.9% | 25.0% | 65.0% | 35.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 55.5% | 39.2% | 47.1% | 25.0% | 48.8% | 32.4% | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% |
| 17 | 2020 | 17/17 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 61.7% | 63.9% | 49.2% | 52.2% | 51.0% | 58.3% | 44.9% | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% |
| 18 | 2021 | 33/35 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 64.2% | 63.5% | 48.3% | 58.0% | 48.9% | 58.2% | 43.5% | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% |
| 19 | 2022 | 29/29 | 2.3 | 4.2 | 64.9% | 65.4% | 48.0% | 58.8% | 43.6% | 59.2% | 40.0% | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% |
| 20 | 2023 | 47/48 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 63.0% | 67.8% | 49.0% | 53.9% | 48.9% | 61.0% | 44.0% | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% |
| 21 | 2024 | 50/54 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 64.9% | 66.0% | 47.0% | 55.5% | 47.6% | 59.3% | 44.2% | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% |
| 22 | 2025 | 37/53 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 62.3% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 55.9% | 43.5% | 60.3% | 43.5% | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% |
| 23 | 2026 | 37/39 | 2.2 | 4.5 | 62.5% | 66.4% | 47.6% | 59.2% | 42.0% | 59.5% | 40.5% | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% |
| Career | — | 254/279 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 63.4% | 66.1% | 48.0% | 56.3% | 46.0% | 59.5% | 42.8% | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1499 | 100.0 | -0.12 | -1.78 | 1.014 | 50.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | +0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 1472 | 93.0 | -1.04 | -1.61 | 0.633 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.38 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 17 | 2020 | 1683 | 134.6 | +0.76 | +1.49 | 1.077 | 51.6% | +1 | -111 | — | 56.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.8 | -0.37 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1817 | 141.4 | +1.54 | +0.39 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +33 | -268 | -198 | 56.8% | +0.43 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–3 (63%) | 108.5 | +0.22 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 |
| 19 | 2022 | 1799 | 140.8 | +2.24 | -1.39 | 0.982 | 49.8% | -3 | -109 | — | 50.0% | +0.09 | 8–4 (67%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.8 | -0.56 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 |
| 20 | 2023 | 1830 | 142.4 | +3.34 | +1.19 | 1.130 | 52.5% | +29 | -211 | -213 | 56.7% | +0.51 | 5–9 (36%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.0 | +0.40 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 |
| 21 | 2024 | 1870 | 152.2 | +2.00 | +1.26 | 1.084 | 51.7% | -12 | -167 | -39 | 54.8% | +0.57 | 12–10 (55%) | 8–4 (67%) | 107.2 | +0.09 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2025 | 1910 | 152.4 | +2.92 | +1.14 | 1.097 | 51.7% | +46 | -263 | -123 | 56.2% | +0.45 | 7–8 (47%) | 9–8 (53%) | 97.8 | +0.37 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 |
| 23 | 2026 | 1801 | 144.8 | +1.66 | -1.37 | 1.001 | 50.4% | +50 | -97 | -87 | 44.4% | +0.08 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–11 (21%) | 95.4 | +1.08 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.05 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +110 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 |
| Career | — | 1930 | 150.6 | +2.18 | +0.40 | 1.059 | 51.2% | +23 | -162 | -109 | 53.5% | +0.37 | 48–44 (52%) | 38–39 (49%) | 103.8 | +0.71 | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.89 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 4 | 1 | 5 | Aug 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Mirra Andreeva | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |