H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Leylah Fernandez vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 0-1

Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2025 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-3.

Canada Age 24 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #104 6-2 6-3 Leylah Fernandez #38 Match data Jul 2, 2025 R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leylah Fernandez #23 #13 2,605 1,939 167 128 56.6% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Laura Siegemund #191 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leylah Fernandez Laura Siegemund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2018 1–1 50.0% #434 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2019 0–2 0.0% #212 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2020 10–7 58.8% #88 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2021 21–14 60.0% #24 1,816 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2022 16–13 55.2% #40 1,798 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2023 27–20 57.4% #35 1,830 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2024 30–23 56.6% #31 1,869 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2025 30–23 56.6% #22 1,912 0 5 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0
23 2026 32–25 56.1% #23 1,939 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,802 0 2
38 — — — — — — — 2026 8–12 40.0% #191 1,748 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leylah Fernandez Laura Siegemund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2020 8 6 14 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2021 17 9 26 65.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2024 17 14 31 54.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2025 25 15 40 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2026 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 123 84 207 59.4% 29 29 58 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/298 of Leylah Fernandez's and 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Leylah Fernandez Laura Siegemund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2018 2/2 1.5 2.5 57.8% 73.9% 52.3% 61.9% 25.0% 65.0% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2019 2/2 2.0 3.5 59.7% 55.5% 39.2% 47.1% 25.0% 48.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2020 17/17 1.6 4.9 61.7% 63.9% 49.2% 52.2% 51.0% 58.3% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2021 33/35 2.0 4.9 64.2% 63.5% 48.3% 58.0% 48.9% 58.2% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 29/29 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.4% 48.0% 58.8% 43.6% 59.2% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 47/48 3.0 4.7 63.0% 67.8% 49.0% 53.9% 48.9% 61.0% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2024 50/54 2.7 4.7 64.9% 66.0% 47.0% 55.5% 47.6% 59.3% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2025 37/53 2.4 3.5 62.3% 67.6% 48.2% 55.9% 43.5% 60.3% 43.5% 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5%
23 2026 54/58 2.5 4.5 63.0% 66.1% 47.6% 59.4% 44.9% 59.4% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3%
Career — 271/298 2.5 4.5 63.5% 66.0% 48.0% 56.5% 46.3% 59.5% 43.1% — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leylah Fernandez Laura Siegemund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2018 1499 100.0 -0.12 -1.78 1.014 50.1% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2019 1472 93.0 -1.04 -1.61 0.633 41.0% — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2020 1683 135.1 +0.76 +1.49 1.077 51.6% +1 -111 — 56.4% +0.56 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 103.8 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2021 1817 141.4 +1.54 +0.39 1.039 50.9% +33 -268 -198 56.8% +0.43 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 108.5 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 1799 140.8 +2.24 -1.39 0.982 49.8% -3 -109 — 50.0% +0.09 8–4 (67%) 6–6 (50%) 103.8 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 1830 142.4 +3.34 +1.19 1.130 52.5% +28 -212 -213 56.7% +0.51 5–9 (36%) 4–5 (44%) 96.0 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2024 1870 152.2 +2.00 +1.26 1.084 51.7% -12 -167 -39 54.8% +0.57 12–10 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 107.2 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2025 1912 152.4 +2.92 +1.14 1.097 51.7% +45 -265 -123 56.2% +0.45 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) 97.8 +0.21 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13
23 2026 1940 152.1 +1.89 +0.47 1.044 51.2% +46 -238 -228 53.4% +0.45 11–8 (58%) 4–12 (25%) 97.5 +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1747 132.1 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -99 +75 -189 56.6% +0.36 10–4 (71%) 3–5 (38%) 105.6 -0.49
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1693 115.3 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 45.9% +0.11 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +48 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1655 117.6 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1801 134.6 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1740 133.6 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1803 133.0 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -12 -161 -26 48.4% -0.35 4–6 (40%) 4–5 (44%) 97.5 -0.28
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1749 133.0 0.00 -0.52 0.964 49.2% -25 -31 -37 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.29
Career — 1940 151.8 +2.19 +0.66 1.064 51.3% +24 -196 -132 54.7% +0.43 53–46 (54%) 39–40 (49%) 104.3 +0.79 — 1852 137.2 -0.43 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -87 48.7% -0.08 53–51 (51%) 30–46 (39%) 94.6 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.