H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Leylah Fernandez vs Mihaela Buzarnescu.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | 6-4 6-2 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data | Mar 22, 2021 | Q1 | Miami Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #33 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 152 | 125 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,883 | 60 | 65 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #31 | 1,869 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #122 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1499 | 100.0 | -0.12 | -1.78 | 1.014 | 50.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | +0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 1472 | 93.0 | -1.04 | -1.61 | 0.633 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 1683 | 134.6 | +0.76 | +1.49 | 1.077 | 51.6% | +1 | -111 | — | 56.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.8 | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 1817 | 141.4 | +1.54 | +0.39 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +33 | -268 | -198 | 56.8% | +0.43 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–3 (63%) | 108.5 | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 1799 | 140.8 | +2.24 | -1.39 | 0.982 | 49.8% | -3 | -109 | — | 50.0% | +0.09 | 8–4 (67%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.8 | -0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 1830 | 142.4 | +3.34 | +1.19 | 1.130 | 52.5% | +29 | -211 | -213 | 56.7% | +0.51 | 5–9 (36%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.0 | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 1870 | 152.2 | +2.00 | +1.26 | 1.084 | 51.7% | -12 | -167 | -39 | 54.8% | +0.57 | 12–10 (55%) | 8–4 (67%) | 107.2 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 1910 | 152.5 | +2.92 | +1.14 | 1.097 | 51.7% | +46 | -263 | -123 | 56.2% | +0.45 | 7–8 (47%) | 9–8 (53%) | 97.8 | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 1801 | 144.8 | +1.66 | -1.37 | 1.001 | 50.4% | +49 | -97 | -87 | 44.4% | +0.08 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–11 (21%) | 95.4 | +1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1485 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1573 | 120.2 | +0.92 | -0.16 | 0.992 | 49.4% | -14 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 2–0 | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.47 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1808 | 137.2 | +1.56 | +2.47 | 1.069 | 51.3% | -121 | -68 | -54 | 58.8% | +0.57 | 12–7 (63%) | 8–5 (62%) | 107.6 | -1.35 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1638 | 120.0 | -1.04 | -1.58 | 0.917 | 48.4% | -54 | +59 | +91 | 38.8% | -0.69 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 92.2 | +0.04 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1623 | 99.7 | -2.53 | -0.84 | 0.712 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1640 | 125.0 | -1.96 | -2.07 | 0.883 | 47.2% | -37 | +90 | — | 41.3% | -0.94 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–3 (40%) | 99.4 | -0.31 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1609 | 93.0 | -1.53 | -3.06 | 0.725 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | +0.26 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1534 | 79.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
| Career | — | 1930 | 150.6 | +2.18 | +0.40 | 1.059 | 51.2% | +23 | -162 | -109 | 53.5% | +0.37 | 48–44 (52%) | 38–39 (49%) | 103.8 | +0.71 | — | 1883 | 126.9 | +0.09 | +0.23 | 0.973 | 49.4% | -75 | +3 | -20 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 20–21 (49%) | 15–14 (52%) | 101.5 | -1.55 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 4 | 1 | 5 | Aug 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Mirra Andreeva | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 26, 2019 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 6, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 5, 2019 | H2H |
| Lesia Tsurenko | 2 | 1 | 3 | Dec 31, 2018 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 9, 2018 | H2H |