H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Leylah Fernandez vs Nao Hibino H2H: 2-1
Leylah Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leylah Fernandez leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Leylah Fernandez won the 2024 Toronto second round 6-3 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2024* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2020 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 6-0 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Sep 12, 2019* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-5 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |