H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Leylah Fernandez vs Paula Badosa H2H: 1-2
Paula Badosa holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leylah Fernandez won the 2024 Doha third round 0-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2024* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 0-6 6-2 6-3 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 7-5 7-6(6) | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-4 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2020 | Auckland | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 7-5 7-6(3) | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 171 | 112 | 60.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Paula Badosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,876 | 0 | 4 |