H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Cagla Buyukakcay H2H: 0-1
Cagla Buyukakcay holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Fruhvirtova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cagla Buyukakcay leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cagla Buyukakcay won the 2023 Rabat third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 21
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Cagla Buyukakcay | 7-5 6-4 | Linda Fruhvirtova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Fruhvirtova | #184 | #49 | 1,050 | 1,721 | 41 | 53 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Fruhvirtova | Cagla Buyukakcay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #747 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2021 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2022 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2026 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |