H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Nadia Podoroska H2H: 1-0
Linda Fruhvirtova holds a 1–0 lead over Nadia Podoroska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Fruhvirtova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Fruhvirtova won the 2022 Chennai semifinal 5-7 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 21
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2022* | Chennai | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Linda Fruhvirtova | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Nadia Podoroska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Fruhvirtova | #184 | #49 | 1,050 | 1,721 | 41 | 53 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nadia Podoroska | #471 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,762 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Fruhvirtova | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #747 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2021 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2022 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2026 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |