H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-1
Liudmila Samsonova and Danka Kovinic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on clay, while Liudmila Samsonova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-4 7-6(4) | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |