H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Kamilla Rakhimova H2H: 1-1
Liudmila Samsonova and Kamilla Rakhimova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kamilla Rakhimova leads 1–0 on grass, while Liudmila Samsonova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liudmila Samsonova won the 2025 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-2 6-4 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2022* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Kamilla Rakhimova | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2019 | Moscow | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | #78 | #60 | 1,023 | 1,752 | 56 | 85 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #97 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |