H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Tamara Zidansek H2H: 2-0
Liudmila Samsonova holds a 2–0 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Liudmila Samsonova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liudmila Samsonova won the 2022 Berlin third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Liudmila Samsonova | 7-5 6-1 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2019* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-2 7-5 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2019 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |