H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Louisa Chirico H2H: 0-1
Louisa Chirico holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louisa Chirico leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Louisa Chirico won the 2016 Charleston third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Louisa Chirico | 6-3 6-3 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Louisa Chirico | #382 | #58 | 1,020 | 1,668 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Louisa Chirico | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #111 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #208 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |