H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Lucrezia Stefanini vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 0-1
Anett Kontaveit holds a 1–0 lead over Lucrezia Stefanini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2023 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 28
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2023* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anett Kontaveit | 6-4 6-4 | Lucrezia Stefanini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucrezia Stefanini | #145 | #100 | 714 | 1,634 | 14 | 29 | 32.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucrezia Stefanini | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |