Lyudmyla Kichenok
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 21, 2016 | H2H |
| Ana Bogdan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 4, 2016 | H2H |
| Tereza Martincova | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 3, 2016 | H2H |
| Teliana Pereira | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 2, 2016 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lyudmyla Kichenok vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Lyudmyla Kichenok | Match data | May 13, 2016 | Q1 | Strasbourg Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyudmyla Kichenok | #1,014 | #156 | 384 | 1,500 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lyudmyla Kichenok | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #339 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #363 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lyudmyla Kichenok | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 66 | 98 | 164 | 40.2% | 49 | 42 | 91 | 53.8% | 21 | 24 | 45 | 46.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lyudmyla Kichenok | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1676 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | -116 | +86 | — | 67.7% | +1.23 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–2 (60%) | 105.4 | +0.12 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1769 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -188 | +120 | — | 52.6% | +0.37 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.1 | +0.58 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1754 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | -144 | — | -16 | 45.6% | -0.53 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.0 | -0.60 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1599 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | -42 | +102 | +114 | 19.4% | -2.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.6 | -0.28 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1595 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +137 | — | 36.4% | -0.27 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1490 | 98.4 | +0.05 | +1.01 | 0.652 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 2002 | 1545 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | -70 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.53 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.26 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1468 | 93.8 | +0.29 | -4.19 | 0.807 | 46.2% | +23 | — | — | 33.3% | -2.07 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.26 | 2003 | 1525 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1482 | 109.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 1451 | 93.8 | -1.53 | -2.61 | 0.926 | 48.3% | +16 | — | — | 41.7% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1443 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1537 | 109.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.13 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1427 | 91.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1518 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1409 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1554 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | -70 | — | +160 | 44.4% | -0.52 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.12 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1402 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1551 | 110.1 | — | — | — | — | -82 | +119 | +144 | 41.2% | -0.96 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–2 (71%) | 100.3 | -0.83 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1535 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | -72 | +122 | +176 | 39.1% | -1.13 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.2 | +0.36 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1562 | 122.6 | +0.65 | -0.89 | 1.023 | 51.1% | -102 | +80 | +154 | 47.5% | +0.25 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.1 | -0.31 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1391 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1707 | 129.5 | +2.54 | +0.56 | 1.087 | 51.8% | -37 | -115 | — | 59.5% | +0.71 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.2 | -0.45 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1634 | 127.2 | -1.64 | -2.22 | 0.875 | 47.8% | -4 | -66 | +47 | 43.0% | -0.22 | 7–12 (37%) | 2–10 (17%) | 93.1 | -0.40 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1625 | 127.9 | -1.32 | +3.68 | 1.050 | 51.1% | -46 | +79 | -10 | 47.9% | +0.14 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.8 | -0.85 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1699 | 137.2 | -0.69 | +1.19 | 0.960 | 49.5% | +14 | +54 | — | 52.4% | +0.08 | 10–6 (63%) | 3–5 (38%) | 101.6 | -0.19 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1690 | 108.4 | -2.20 | -1.43 | 0.772 | 44.8% | +7 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| Career | — | 1500 | 93.9 | -0.49 | -3.10 | 0.843 | 46.8% | +20 | — | — | 38.2% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | +4.53 | — | 1799 | 132.5 | -0.52 | +0.68 | 0.977 | 49.8% | -54 | +70 | +84 | 45.8% | -0.27 | 51–50 (50%) | 31–45 (41%) | 97.4 | -1.09 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 21, 2016 | H2H |
| Ana Bogdan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 4, 2016 | H2H |
| Tereza Martincova | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 3, 2016 | H2H |
| Teliana Pereira | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 2, 2016 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Pliskova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 31, 2017 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 17, 2017 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 27, 2016 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 29, 2016 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 31, 2017 | H2H |