H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 1-0

Madison Brengle holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Peterson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2022 Adelaide 2 second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rebecca Peterson
Sweden Age 31 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #59 6-3 6-2 Rebecca Peterson #93 Match data Jan 13, 2022* R16 Adelaide 2 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rebecca Peterson #573 #43 1,332 1,861 80 95 45.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Rebecca Peterson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #263 1,484 0 0
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #230 1,489 0 0
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0 2015 3–4 42.9% #131 1,505 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2016 3–6 33.3% #146 1,505 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0 2017 2–3 40.0% #174 1,550 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2018 10–11 47.6% #63 1,693 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2019 25–18 58.1% #44 1,861 0 2
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0 2020 3–10 23.1% #55 1,697 0 2
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0 2021 18–18 50.0% #88 1,699 0 2
26 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0 2022 7–14 33.3% #119 1,659 0 2
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0 2023 8–7 53.3% #127 1,647 0 2
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Brengle Rebecca Peterson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 17 9 26 65.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2023 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — 58 51 109 53.2% 18 34 52 34.6% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Brengle Rebecca Peterson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0% 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 64.3% 41.7% 40.0% 45.5% 66.7% 41.1% 42.2%
18 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3% 2014 3/3 0.7 4.0 64.5% 51.3% 36.8% 49.5% 42.5% 46.3% 44.1%
19 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5% 2015 5/7 0.8 4.8 70.0% 57.3% 48.6% 36.8% 50.3% 55.0% 41.0%
20 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2% 2016 9/9 1.6 3.6 68.4% 61.4% 41.7% 48.7% 51.7% 55.4% 40.7%
21 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6% 2017 5/5 2.2 3.2 64.2% 63.6% 48.6% 73.1% 59.8% 58.0% 42.1%
22 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7% 2018 21/21 3.6 3.7 63.7% 62.9% 41.3% 57.6% 50.4% 55.0% 43.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 42/43 2.2 2.8 67.1% 61.9% 50.4% 57.2% 44.5% 58.0% 43.3%
24 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3% 2020 13/13 1.5 2.8 66.5% 55.9% 44.5% 36.8% 30.4% 51.8% 39.5%
25 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3% 2021 34/36 2.3 3.4 65.5% 62.2% 47.7% 52.4% 47.4% 57.1% 41.3%
26 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1% 2022 20/21 1.9 3.7 63.7% 61.1% 42.5% 45.1% 45.0% 54.0% 39.8%
27 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1% 2023 15/15 2.1 4.1 65.3% 64.3% 40.5% 53.5% 51.5% 55.9% 45.3%
28 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5% — 168/175 2.2 3.4 65.7% 61.3% 45.5% 52.1% 46.5% 55.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Brengle Rebecca Peterson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1488 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27 2013 1485 102.5 +3.18 +1.91 0.716 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.28
18 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40 2014 1490 101.8 -1.67 +0.24 0.821 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
19 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06 2015 1505 104.6 -0.71 -1.19 0.911 47.7% — -1 — 37.5% -1.06 2–0 1–1 — -0.09
20 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2016 1506 107.2 -0.91 -1.94 0.911 48.2% +59 -42 — 42.1% -0.37 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
21 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03 2017 1550 106.4 +0.60 -1.14 1.003 50.3% +49 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
22 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16 2018 1693 125.9 -0.84 -0.13 0.960 49.2% +26 -250 -63 46.7% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.29
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1862 140.3 +1.54 +0.91 1.032 50.8% -2 -323 -222 53.6% +0.22 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -2.59
24 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14 2020 1698 103.7 -2.62 -2.51 0.819 45.3% +41 -190 — 20.8% -2.08 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.28
25 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20 2021 1700 129.0 +0.81 -0.92 0.963 49.2% +11 -79 — 49.4% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 6–6 (50%) 103.0 -0.71
26 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69 2022 1659 117.2 -1.27 -2.53 0.866 47.2% +49 -54 — 33.3% -0.89 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
27 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74 2023 1647 126.0 -0.31 +1.31 1.028 50.7% +73 -62 — 48.5% +0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 97.8 -0.35
28 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35 2024 1645 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77 — 1862 129.7 0.00 -0.51 0.952 49.0% +25 -149 -151 44.3% -0.36 28–25 (53%) 18–28 (39%) 101.5 -2.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.