H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Madison Brengle holds a 2–0 lead over Richel Hogenkamp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Madison Brengle leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Brengle | 6-3 6-1 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data | Mar 6, 2018 | Q2 | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Madison Brengle | 6-3 6-3 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data | Jul 5, 2017* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Madison Brengle | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data | Jun 10, 2016* | R16 | Libéma Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Brengle | #212 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,722 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,581 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Brengle | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #73 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Madison Brengle | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2014 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2015 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2017 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2016 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2017 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 65 | 103 | 168 | 38.7% | 17 | 31 | 48 | 35.4% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | — | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Madison Brengle | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2007 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 60.2% | 57.4% | 40.8% | 48.9% | 50.7% | 50.5% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 2/3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 66.3% | 49.4% | 35.3% | 12.5% | 63.6% | 45.2% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 61.8% | 56.2% | 38.6% | 41.1% | 37.6% | 49.3% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 53.7% | 44.4% | 38.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 41.8% | 47.2% | 2012 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 48.8% | 65.9% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 43.2% | 57.0% | 36.8% |
| 21 | 2011 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 56.3% | 44.7% | 38.9% | 40.0% | 52.0% | 35.6% | 2013 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 57.2% | 55.4% | 46.8% | 57.9% | 78.0% | 52.0% | 45.5% |
| 22 | 2012 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 65.2% | 61.3% | 35.0% | 30.0% | 83.3% | 52.2% | 41.7% | 2014 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 64.9% | 56.6% | 37.3% | 55.0% | 65.3% | 50.3% | 48.5% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8/9 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 59.2% | 60.5% | 48.0% | 55.2% | 51.4% | 55.8% | 34.4% |
| 24 | 2014 | 7/8 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 66.2% | 62.5% | 42.8% | 49.4% | 47.3% | 55.7% | 44.3% | 2016 | 6/6 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 55.6% | 63.8% | 49.0% | 61.8% | 57.0% | 57.1% | 45.2% |
| 25 | 2015 | 35/51 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 66.0% | 61.5% | 48.8% | 42.8% | 46.6% | 57.2% | 41.3% | 2017 | 13/13 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 59.1% | 62.5% | 49.4% | 47.9% | 42.7% | 57.2% | 39.2% |
| 26 | 2016 | 37/39 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 68.5% | 56.8% | 45.7% | 46.0% | 54.9% | 53.2% | 43.1% | 2018 | 5/5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 55.4% | 55.2% | 40.6% | 47.6% | 31.3% | 48.4% | 34.0% |
| 27 | 2017 | 28/28 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 73.3% | 54.5% | 39.2% | 43.7% | 45.2% | 50.6% | 44.1% | 2019 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 61.5% | 54.2% | 43.3% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 43.3% |
| 28 | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 66.6% | 50.4% | 43.5% | 42.0% | 45.0% | 48.4% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 18/18 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 73.8% | 51.9% | 37.5% | 39.8% | 54.6% | 48.3% | 47.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 6/6 | 0.2 | 3.7 | 72.6% | 50.8% | 44.5% | 45.3% | 38.1% | 49.0% | 48.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 20/20 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 74.5% | 55.6% | 39.8% | 42.5% | 48.0% | 51.4% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 27/28 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 73.1% | 55.8% | 39.7% | 41.5% | 47.1% | 51.3% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 20/20 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 75.1% | 54.6% | 41.7% | 40.9% | 51.5% | 51.4% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 225/246 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 70.3% | 55.9% | 42.5% | 42.8% | 49.0% | 52.0% | 43.5% | — | 40/42 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 57.8% | 60.5% | 47.0% | 53.0% | 49.0% | 54.9% | 39.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Madison Brengle | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1502 | 111.1 | 0.00 | +0.02 | 0.829 | 46.5% | +16 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | — | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 1458 | 92.5 | -3.04 | -1.39 | 0.681 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 1457 | 101.5 | -2.95 | -0.91 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1447 | 99.2 | -3.58 | -2.65 | 0.810 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | 2012 | 1513 | 105.3 | +0.72 | -1.37 | 0.857 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1460 | 101.5 | -2.09 | -1.94 | 0.741 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.03 | 2013 | 1525 | 101.1 | -1.26 | -0.60 | 0.947 | 49.5% | — | +62 | — | 44.4% | -0.45 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1444 | 99.4 | -2.21 | +0.67 | 0.871 | 47.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.16 | 2014 | 1530 | 104.8 | -1.97 | -1.72 | 0.975 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1496 | 108.3 | -1.68 | -2.17 | 0.778 | 45.4% | -26 | +70 | — | 26.3% | -1.68 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.22 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1474 | 113.6 | -0.29 | +1.12 | 1.002 | 50.0% | +31 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.64 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.14 | 2016 | 1549 | 112.0 | -0.08 | +0.20 | 1.052 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1622 | 128.8 | -0.60 | -0.18 | 0.964 | 49.3% | +5 | -83 | — | 48.7% | -0.07 | 7–8 (47%) | 6–6 (50%) | 100.8 | +0.20 | 2017 | 1538 | 106.6 | +0.40 | -2.44 | 0.917 | 48.4% | -45 | — | +57 | 39.3% | -0.64 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.12 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1592 | 127.1 | -1.99 | +0.54 | 0.921 | 48.3% | +5 | -75 | +29 | 42.4% | -0.75 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.3 | -1.69 | 2018 | 1514 | 95.9 | -2.74 | -3.00 | 0.659 | 41.5% | — | +56 | — | 9.1% | -3.36 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1654 | 130.5 | -4.01 | +1.14 | 0.892 | 47.3% | -26 | -55 | -1 | 38.2% | -0.78 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.1 | -1.74 | 2019 | 1479 | 104.6 | +0.93 | +3.09 | 0.867 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1605 | 118.6 | -4.52 | +0.81 | 0.843 | 45.8% | -20 | -29 | — | 33.3% | -1.36 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | -1.35 | 2020 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 1602 | 115.2 | -5.23 | +2.99 | 0.913 | 47.8% | -46 | -26 | — | 42.1% | -0.68 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1644 | 121.9 | -2.92 | +1.95 | 0.947 | 48.8% | -1 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.07 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | -0.11 | 2022 | 1468 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 1645 | 119.5 | -3.17 | +0.46 | 0.907 | 47.7% | +15 | -91 | +14 | 34.8% | -1.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1631 | 135.0 | -3.81 | +1.21 | 0.902 | 47.6% | +61 | -46 | -100 | 42.6% | -0.72 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.1 | -0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 1583 | 118.6 | -4.39 | -0.51 | 0.886 | 47.1% | +13 | +7 | -81 | 34.9% | -1.26 | 0–5 (0%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.1 | -0.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1572 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 1521 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1723 | 129.4 | -2.95 | +0.67 | 0.906 | 47.8% | +6 | -59 | -14 | 40.6% | -0.76 | 27–45 (38%) | 25–22 (53%) | 98.9 | -2.77 | — | 1581 | 108.2 | -0.69 | -1.69 | 0.874 | 47.4% | -39 | +63 | +57 | 35.9% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–8 (0%) | 92.3 | -1.95 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2023 | H2H |
| Kateryna Baindl | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2020 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 8, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Lara Arruabarrena | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Madison Brengle | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |