H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 2-1
Madison Keys holds a 2–1 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Madison Keys leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2020 US Open third round 7-6(4) 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 7-6(4) 3-2 (ret.) | Madison Keys | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Madison Keys | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Madison Keys | 6-2 6-4 | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Alizé Cornet | #460 | #11 | 3,256 | 1,884 | 376 | 358 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Alizé Cornet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #16 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #88 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #44 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #19 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #43 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,702 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #38 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #59 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | 2021 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #61 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #117 | 1,684 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #391 | 1,613 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,558 | 0 | 6 |