Madison Keys
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | 10 | 2 | 12 | Jan 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 9 | 11 | Sep 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Aug 20, 2022 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Madison Keys holds a 4–2 lead over Elina Svitolina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2025 Australian Open quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Elina Svitolina | Match data | Jan 22, 2025 | QF | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Madison Keys | 6-2 6-4 | Elina Svitolina | Match data | Jan 12, 2022* | R32 | Adelaide 2 | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Elina Svitolina | 7-5 6-4 | Madison Keys | Match data | Sep 3, 2019* | R16 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Elina Svitolina | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | Madison Keys | Match data | Jan 22, 2019* | R16 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Madison Keys | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-4 | Elina Svitolina | Match data | Sep 5, 2017* | R16 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Madison Keys | 7-6(4) 4-2 (ret.) | Elina Svitolina | Match data | Aug 27, 2015* | R32 | New Haven | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #24 | #5 | 5,004 | 2,134 | 374 | 217 | 63.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| Elina Svitolina | #9 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,136 | 450 | 234 | 65.8% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 20 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Elina Svitolina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 13 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,965 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #15 | 1,919 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,865 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,778 | 0 | 16 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #12 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,890 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,945 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,981 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 2026 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,982 | 1 | 11 | 2026 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #9 | 2,065 | 0 | 20 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Madison Keys | Elina Svitolina | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 2015 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25 | 18 | 43 | 58.1% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 36 | 16 | 52 | 69.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32 | 11 | 43 | 74.4% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33 | 10 | 43 | 76.7% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33 | 16 | 49 | 67.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 31 | 13 | 44 | 70.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 24 | 8 | 32 | 75.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 218 | 142 | 360 | 60.6% | 93 | 54 | 147 | 63.3% | 63 | 21 | 84 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 300 | 156 | 456 | 65.8% | 116 | 51 | 167 | 69.5% | 32 | 26 | 58 | 55.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 600/684 of Elina Svitolina's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Madison Keys | Elina Svitolina | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 14 | 2009 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 47.5% | 66.4% | 55.5% | 44.4% | 41.7% | 60.1% | 39.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 55.4% | 67.2% | 46.9% | 60.5% | 44.8% | 58.2% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 5/5 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 58.1% | 56.5% | 44.8% | 38.4% | 32.9% | 51.2% | 36.0% | 2012 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 52.0% | 58.6% | 39.9% | 33.1% | 30.0% | 49.1% | 33.5% |
| 18 | 2013 | 39/41 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 70.0% | 48.7% | 65.0% | 45.9% | 61.4% | 42.4% | 2013 | 28/32 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 58.0% | 60.4% | 42.9% | 57.0% | 45.7% | 53.0% | 44.6% |
| 19 | 2014 | 45/48 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 69.4% | 50.0% | 50.9% | 48.7% | 61.9% | 43.5% | 2014 | 56/60 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 63.9% | 64.3% | 44.4% | 48.5% | 49.8% | 57.2% | 44.3% |
| 20 | 2015 | 38/50 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 62.2% | 71.5% | 51.3% | 61.5% | 48.1% | 64.1% | 41.2% | 2015 | 51/64 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 63.7% | 63.7% | 48.2% | 43.8% | 49.8% | 58.1% | 44.5% |
| 21 | 2016 | 49/64 | 5.5 | 1.9 | 64.4% | 70.5% | 52.7% | 60.1% | 52.6% | 64.1% | 43.8% | 2016 | 50/63 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 62.6% | 64.8% | 45.9% | 49.9% | 51.7% | 57.7% | 45.7% |
| 22 | 2017 | 27/27 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 62.7% | 69.2% | 49.3% | 59.9% | 47.8% | 62.0% | 43.9% | 2017 | 56/65 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 60.0% | 68.3% | 49.3% | 58.2% | 51.7% | 60.7% | 49.5% |
| 23 | 2018 | 42/44 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 64.0% | 71.2% | 47.8% | 57.5% | 45.0% | 62.8% | 44.2% | 2018 | 54/59 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 62.4% | 68.3% | 50.0% | 48.9% | 48.5% | 61.2% | 46.4% |
| 24 | 2019 | 40/40 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 71.3% | 47.2% | 59.7% | 46.2% | 62.0% | 43.9% | 2019 | 56/62 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 60.0% | 66.9% | 44.9% | 53.6% | 49.3% | 58.3% | 45.4% |
| 25 | 2020 | 13/13 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 67.7% | 72.9% | 51.8% | 55.6% | 48.6% | 66.2% | 44.1% | 2020 | 27/27 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 60.8% | 65.5% | 45.9% | 57.9% | 41.9% | 57.9% | 44.6% |
| 26 | 2021 | 26/26 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 63.7% | 66.7% | 43.0% | 58.2% | 39.9% | 58.2% | 41.3% | 2021 | 53/59 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 59.9% | 67.8% | 48.8% | 58.9% | 48.2% | 60.3% | 45.3% |
| 27 | 2022 | 48/49 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 63.3% | 67.9% | 48.2% | 54.1% | 44.3% | 60.8% | 43.7% | 2022 | 12/13 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 61.3% | 63.3% | 45.9% | 55.7% | 45.9% | 56.3% | 43.7% |
| 28 | 2023 | 43/45 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 67.5% | 68.3% | 48.3% | 60.2% | 48.0% | 62.0% | 44.4% | 2023 | 26/27 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 62.6% | 65.2% | 46.0% | 51.2% | 51.6% | 57.9% | 44.5% |
| 29 | 2024 | 36/37 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 69.4% | 66.5% | 46.5% | 60.4% | 46.5% | 60.6% | 44.9% | 2024 | 43/46 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 61.2% | 66.8% | 47.1% | 53.4% | 47.2% | 59.1% | 44.7% |
| 30 | 2025 | 42/52 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 65.8% | 66.8% | 46.6% | 57.8% | 44.0% | 59.9% | 45.5% | 2025 | 34/47 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 57.3% | 68.3% | 48.0% | 58.6% | 51.7% | 59.1% | 46.6% |
| 31 | 2026 | 45/45 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 64.3% | 71.5% | 47.4% | 56.1% | 48.8% | 63.0% | 45.1% | 2026 | 51/57 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 60.0% | 68.3% | 47.5% | 61.0% | 52.9% | 60.1% | 48.2% |
| Career | — | 543/591 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 63.7% | 69.3% | 48.5% | 58.1% | 46.7% | 61.8% | 43.7% | — | 600/684 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 61.1% | 66.2% | 47.0% | 53.5% | 49.4% | 58.7% | 45.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Madison Keys | Elina Svitolina | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1513 | 104.9 | -0.92 | -0.60 | 0.987 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | — | — | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1517 | 113.3 | -3.13 | -0.25 | 1.071 | 51.6% | +19 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1514 | 113.2 | -0.48 | -2.14 | 0.738 | 43.5% | +13 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.09 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.51 | 2012 | 1466 | 100.5 | -1.44 | -1.31 | 0.658 | 41.7% | +21 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.17 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.18 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1726 | 137.3 | +4.59 | -0.90 | 1.100 | 51.9% | -46 | -118 | -57 | 58.2% | +0.62 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.0 | +0.04 | 2013 | 1561 | 121.0 | -1.24 | +0.27 | 0.948 | 48.9% | -7 | +4 | — | 41.7% | -0.57 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.6 | -0.01 |
| 19 | 2014 | 1744 | 136.9 | +5.12 | +0.02 | 1.142 | 52.3% | -64 | -93 | +79 | 56.9% | +0.45 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–8 (47%) | 96.1 | -0.67 | 2014 | 1791 | 137.5 | +0.84 | +1.00 | 1.036 | 50.8% | 0 | -193 | -198 | 56.1% | +0.29 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–5 (64%) | 108.3 | +0.54 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1811 | 145.8 | +4.84 | +0.40 | 1.147 | 52.7% | -23 | -103 | +11 | 63.6% | +1.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.8 | +0.70 | 2015 | 1790 | 147.4 | +0.25 | +3.27 | 1.062 | 51.2% | +14 | -22 | -205 | 59.4% | +0.57 | 12–7 (63%) | 11–4 (73%) | 109.5 | +0.39 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1943 | 152.0 | +7.53 | +1.31 | 1.219 | 53.7% | -32 | -117 | -34 | 65.8% | +1.11 | 17–6 (74%) | 14–10 (58%) | 107.1 | -0.49 | 2016 | 1895 | 148.6 | +1.89 | +2.98 | 1.080 | 51.6% | +19 | -120 | -343 | 60.0% | +0.75 | 16–8 (67%) | 8–7 (53%) | 104.1 | -0.32 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1903 | 141.2 | +3.97 | +1.46 | 1.155 | 52.9% | +43 | -160 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 97.5 | +0.26 | 2017 | 1988 | 154.8 | +4.05 | +5.94 | 1.259 | 55.0% | +9 | -29 | -359 | 73.1% | +1.55 | 13–8 (62%) | 10–7 (59%) | 101.9 | +0.07 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1908 | 147.8 | +5.83 | +1.52 | 1.190 | 53.3% | +17 | -74 | -12 | 68.1% | +1.16 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.2 | +1.54 | 2018 | 1994 | 158.3 | +4.84 | +3.77 | 1.197 | 53.6% | +22 | -2 | -341 | 68.2% | +1.32 | 12–6 (67%) | 3–6 (33%) | 100.1 | +0.02 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1913 | 148.9 | +4.30 | +0.69 | 1.158 | 52.9% | +7 | -4 | — | 66.3% | +1.05 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 99.5 | +0.99 | 2019 | 1965 | 159.8 | +2.26 | +3.05 | 1.088 | 51.8% | +28 | -22 | -241 | 60.9% | +0.78 | 10–9 (53%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.5 | -0.58 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1869 | 136.6 | +5.26 | +1.22 | 1.305 | 54.4% | +23 | — | — | 65.4% | +1.46 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.59 | 2020 | 1929 | 129.5 | +1.04 | +1.65 | 1.059 | 51.2% | -34 | +74 | — | 65.5% | +0.48 | 4–0 (100%) | 5–0 (100%) | 108.0 | +0.90 |
| 26 | 2021 | 1733 | 127.6 | +1.29 | -0.81 | 0.988 | 49.7% | +11 | +120 | +234 | 43.6% | -0.07 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.1 | +1.25 | 2021 | 1920 | 154.9 | +4.17 | +3.12 | 1.141 | 52.7% | +24 | +84 | -218 | 61.4% | +0.70 | 14–10 (58%) | 7–9 (44%) | 97.5 | -0.37 |
| 27 | 2022 | 1866 | 154.5 | +3.52 | +1.76 | 1.116 | 52.1% | +14 | -43 | — | 61.1% | +0.58 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 100.5 | -1.43 | 2022 | 1778 | 119.9 | -0.55 | -0.61 | 0.999 | 49.9% | +11 | — | — | 43.3% | -0.13 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–4 (43%) | 92.9 | +1.08 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1908 | 154.0 | +4.44 | +2.18 | 1.168 | 53.1% | -24 | -103 | +181 | 65.3% | +1.28 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.3 | +0.85 | 2023 | 1890 | 139.8 | +2.32 | +1.33 | 1.059 | 51.2% | -58 | +95 | -76 | 59.7% | +0.42 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–1 (86%) | 108.5 | -1.63 |
| 29 | 2024 | 1945 | 153.9 | +3.89 | +2.77 | 1.137 | 52.5% | -67 | +54 | +149 | 67.1% | +1.18 | 5–3 (63%) | 9–3 (75%) | 105.9 | +0.01 | 2024 | 1912 | 155.0 | +2.59 | +2.04 | 1.092 | 52.2% | -17 | +33 | +19 | 62.3% | +0.92 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.6 | -0.52 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1964 | 160.3 | +2.87 | +2.39 | 1.133 | 52.4% | +63 | +39 | +107 | 63.5% | +0.80 | 16–6 (73%) | 10–7 (59%) | 107.8 | -0.52 | 2025 | 1982 | 164.1 | +1.92 | +3.74 | 1.139 | 53.0% | -10 | +106 | -34 | 67.0% | +1.34 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.9 | -0.88 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1982 | 152.9 | +5.10 | +2.77 | 1.218 | 53.6% | -16 | +38 | +175 | 65.7% | +1.21 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | 93.5 | +1.19 | 2026 | 2065 | 166.4 | +3.36 | +5.25 | 1.206 | 54.2% | +19 | +100 | -140 | 67.7% | +1.42 | 16–4 (80%) | 10–5 (67%) | 109.2 | -0.42 |
| Career | — | 2135 | 155.9 | +4.47 | +1.22 | 1.145 | 52.6% | -6 | -39 | +96 | 62.4% | +0.87 | 97–85 (53%) | 92–73 (56%) | 101.0 | +0.62 | — | 2136 | 157.6 | +2.30 | +3.00 | 1.107 | 52.2% | +10 | +15 | -183 | 61.8% | +0.81 | 134–83 (62%) | 94–75 (56%) | 108.2 | -0.23 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | 10 | 2 | 12 | Jan 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 9 | 11 | Sep 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Aug 20, 2022 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | 8 | 6 | 14 | Aug 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 2021 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 7 | 11 | Apr 24, 2021 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 6 | 4 | 10 | Sep 7, 2021 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 3 | 6 | 9 | Feb 21, 2026 | H2H |