H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Johanna Konta H2H: 0-2
Johanna Konta holds a 2–0 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Johanna Konta leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2018 Brisbane third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2018 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Madison Keys | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Johanna Konta | 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4 | Madison Keys | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |