H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 2-1

Madison Keys holds a 2–1 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on clay, while Madison Keys leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Madison Keys #9 6-4 4-6 6-3 Kirsten Flipkens #51 Match data
Mar 23, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Madison Keys #24 6-4 6-2 Kirsten Flipkens #65 Match data
May 23, 2013* Brussels WTA 500 R32 Clay Kirsten Flipkens #21 6-4 1-6 6-2 Madison Keys #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Kirsten Flipkens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1