H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Na Li H2H: 1-2

Na Li holds a 2–1 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Madison Keys leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Miami Open round of 32 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #2 7-6(3) 6-3 Madison Keys #38 Match data Mar 20, 2014* R32 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Madison Keys #62 6-3 6-2 Na Li #5 Match data May 8, 2013* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Na Li #6 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 Madison Keys #135 Match data Jan 12, 2013* QF Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Keys Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% — — — — — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Keys Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 543/591 5.0 2.5 63.7% 69.3% 48.5% 58.1% 46.7% 61.8% 43.7% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Keys Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2026 1982 152.9 +5.09 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +38 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.20 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 2135 155.9 +4.46 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.