H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 2-4

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–2 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2023 Rome third round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2023* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Madison Keys #23 (w/o) Victoria Azarenka #17 Match data
Feb 23, 2023* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Madison Keys #23 6-2 6-1 Victoria Azarenka #14 Match data
Jan 22, 2023* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #24 1-6 6-2 6-1 Madison Keys #13 Match data
Oct 21, 2022* Guadalajara 2 WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #37 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 Madison Keys #15 Match data
Jun 5, 2021* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #16 6-2 6-2 Madison Keys #24 Match data
Mar 21, 2018* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #186 7-6(5) 2-0 (ret.) Madison Keys #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 — — — — — — — 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 — — — — — — — 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21