H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Yingying Duan H2H: 1-0

Madison Keys holds a 1–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Keys leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2016 China Open first round 6-0 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Yingying Duan
China Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Keys #9 6-0 4-6 6-1 Yingying Duan #90 Match data Oct 2, 2016 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Yingying Duan #908 #60 1,002 1,654 36 56 39.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Madison Keys Yingying Duan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #132 1,508 0 0
2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #174 1,511 0 0
2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2014 2–5 28.6% #119 1,476 0 0
2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 2015 6–7 46.2% #118 1,516 0 0
2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 2016 8–7 53.3% #104 1,537 0 1
2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 2017 11–17 39.3% #90 1,582 0 1
2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 2018 5–11 31.2% #145 1,572 0 1
2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2019 1–4 20.0% #395 1,541 0 1
2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% #568 1,532 0 1
2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 — — — — — — —
2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 — — — — — — —
2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 — — — — — — —
2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 — — — — — — —
2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 — — — — — — —
2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 — — — — — — —
2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 — — — — — — —
2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Madison Keys Yingying Duan
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2016 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2017 10 11 21 47.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% 2018 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% Career 32 46 78 41.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 85/92 of Yingying Duan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Madison Keys Yingying Duan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% 2012 2/2 1.5 3.5 64.1% 67.9% 49.1% 85.0% 45.8% 61.7% 42.0%
2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% 2013 5/5 3.6 3.0 65.5% 58.9% 40.6% 29.4% 56.0% 52.3% 42.5%
2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% 2014 5/7 1.4 3.6 61.4% 60.9% 46.0% 57.6% 51.7% 54.9% 39.8%
2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% 2015 9/13 3.1 3.7 61.2% 71.3% 44.9% 55.4% 39.5% 60.8% 39.4%
2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% 2016 14/15 3.6 3.9 65.4% 66.2% 44.5% 56.6% 43.4% 58.7% 42.0%
2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% 2017 28/28 2.6 3.1 67.2% 61.1% 42.7% 52.1% 48.3% 55.1% 39.7%
2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% 2018 16/16 3.9 3.6 67.8% 63.8% 37.4% 61.2% 47.4% 55.7% 41.0%
2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% 2019 5/5 1.2 2.6 63.1% 64.4% 40.2% 43.6% 33.0% 55.4% 35.6%
2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2020 1/1 5.0 2.0 70.4% 60.5% 43.8% 62.5% 50.0% 55.6% 24.5%
2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career 543/591 5.0 2.5 63.7% 69.3% 48.5% 58.1% 46.7% 61.8% 43.7% Career 85/92 3.0 3.4 65.7% 63.7% 42.3% 54.3% 46.1% 56.4% 40.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Madison Keys Yingying Duan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 2012 1508 106.9 -0.29 -0.87 1.098 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.01
2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 2013 1511 104.6 -0.82 -0.25 0.890 47.5% +21 — — 36.4% -1.45 1–0 2–0 — +0.08
2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 2014 1477 101.2 -1.58 -1.40 0.882 47.6% +14 — — 33.3% -0.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.69
2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 2015 1517 106.8 +0.96 -1.58 1.004 49.9% -2 — — 46.7% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.5 +0.60
2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 2016 1538 108.9 +0.86 -0.78 1.017 50.6% -26 — — 48.6% -0.06 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — +1.24
2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 2017 1583 117.0 -0.51 -2.33 0.883 47.6% +30 -93 -6 39.3% -0.93 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 +0.64
2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 2018 1573 127.1 -0.70 -1.07 0.927 48.5% +3 — — 39.5% -0.55 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.27
2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2019 1542 109.9 -0.01 -4.94 0.799 45.8% +17 — — 25.0% -1.67 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.18
2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2020 1533 102.9 +0.45 -3.00 0.551 40.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 1982 152.9 +5.09 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +39 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2135 155.9 +4.46 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 Career 1655 118.7 -0.20 -1.71 0.920 48.4% +8 -93 -6 40.4% -0.66 12–16 (43%) 11–15 (42%) 97.2 +3.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.