H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Madison Keys vs Yuliia Starodubtseva H2H: 0-1
Yuliia Starodubtseva holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yuliia Starodubtseva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yuliia Starodubtseva won the 2026 Charleston semifinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2026 | Charleston | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Yuliia Starodubtseva | 6-1 6-4 | Madison Keys | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Yuliia Starodubtseva | #61 | #53 | 1,139 | 1,800 | 28 | 36 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Madison Keys | Yuliia Starodubtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #113 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |