H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Chloe Paquet H2H: 2-0
Magda Linette holds a 2–0 lead over Chloe Paquet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Magda Linette | 6-3 6-3 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
| May 28, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Magda Linette | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Chloe Paquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |