H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 1-2
Kurumi Nara holds a 2–1 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kurumi Nara leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2019 Tianjin fourth round 4-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Magda Linette | 4-0 (ret.) | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2017 | New Haven | WTA 500 | Q3 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-2 6-2 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kurumi Nara | 3-6 6-3 4-3 (ret.) | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2015* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 7-5 5-7 7-6(6) | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |