H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magda Linette vs Nina Stojanovic H2H: 1-0
Magda Linette holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Stojanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2016 Tianjin third round 7-6(6) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2016* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 7-6(6) 6-0 | Nina Stojanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nina Stojanovic | #493 | #81 | 983 | 1,686 | 24 | 37 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Nina Stojanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #248 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #250 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |