H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Magda Linette vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 2-4

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–2 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2024 Rome second round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magda Linette
POL Age 34 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2024* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #24 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Magda Linette #51 Match data
Oct 2, 2023 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Magda Linette #25 5-7 6-1 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #18 Match data
Aug 9, 2023* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #19 6-3 6-0 Magda Linette #25 Match data
Mar 26, 2023* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Magda Linette #19 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #16 Match data
Oct 9, 2021* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #32 7-5 3-0 (ret.) Magda Linette #54 Match data
Mar 24, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #8 6-3 6-0 Magda Linette #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magda Linette #51 #19 1,921 1,863 219 227 49.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magda Linette Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 — — — — — — — 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2013 4–2 66.7% #123 1,536 0 0 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,517 0 0 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2015 9–11 45.0% #90 1,577 0 0 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2016 10–15 40.0% #96 1,588 0 0 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2017 17–23 42.5% #72 1,728 0 0 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2018 13–17 43.3% #81 1,589 0 0 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2019 26–19 57.8% #43 1,779 0 2 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2020 11–11 50.0% #40 1,720 0 3 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2021 16–16 50.0% #57 1,763 0 3 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2022 23–22 51.1% #48 1,720 0 3 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2023 24–24 50.0% #24 1,732 0 3 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2024 27–25 51.9% #38 1,827 0 4 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2025 19–24 44.2% #54 1,742 0 4 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2026 18–14 56.2% #51 1,799 0 4 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21