H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-1
Magdalena Frech and Danka Kovinic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on clay, while Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2022 Granby third round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2022* | Granby | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2017* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |