H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Mihaela Buzarnescu H2H: 0-1
Mihaela Buzarnescu holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mihaela Buzarnescu won the 2019 Charleston second round 6-1 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Mihaela Buzarnescu | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |