H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Nao Hibino H2H: 1-0
Magdalena Frech holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2024 Nottingham third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2024* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Magdalena Frech | 6-1 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2023 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 6-4 7-6(5) | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |