H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-2
Ons Jabeur holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on clay, while Ons Jabeur leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2025 Roland Garros first round 7-6(4) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2023* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ons Jabeur | 6-3 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |