H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Tereza Martincova
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Magdalena Frech vs Tereza Martincova.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |