H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mara Santangelo vs Emma Laine H2H: 1-1
Mara Santangelo and Emma Laine are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mara Santangelo leads 1–0 on grass, while Emma Laine leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mara Santangelo won the 2006 Birmingham second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 40
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Mara Santangelo | 6-1 6-2 | Emma Laine | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2006* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Emma Laine | 6-1 7-5 | Mara Santangelo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,824 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Emma Laine | #1,001 | #50 | 429 | 1,578 | 21 | 38 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mara Santangelo | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #843 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #74 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #134 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |