H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mara Santangelo vs Julia Vakulenko H2H: 1-1
Mara Santangelo and Julia Vakulenko are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Vakulenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Mara Santangelo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julia Vakulenko won the 2008 Palermo third round 6-4 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Julia Vakulenko | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Mara Santangelo | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2007* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Mara Santangelo | 1-3 (ret.) | Julia Vakulenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,824 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Julia Vakulenko | #979 | #31 | 916 | 1,730 | 51 | 76 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mara Santangelo | Julia Vakulenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #132 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #132 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #130 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #354 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #134 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |