Mara Santangelo
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 2, 2007 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 17, 2009 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 28, 2009 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 16, 2007 | H2H |
| Dinara Safina | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 12, 2008 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Mara Santangelo and Tzipora Obziler are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mara Santangelo won the 2006 Bangalore round of 16 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mara Santangelo | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Tzipora Obziler | Match data | Feb 17, 2006* | R16 | Bangalore | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Tzipora Obziler | 7-6(1) 3-6 7-5 | Mara Santangelo | Match data | Oct 6, 2005* | R32 | Tashkent | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,823 | 74 | 94 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tzipora Obziler | #316 | #75 | 393 | 1,629 | 34 | 50 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mara Santangelo | Tzipora Obziler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #136 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mara Santangelo | Tzipora Obziler | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 45 | 56 | 101 | 44.6% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 31 | 33 | 64 | 48.4% | 3 | 14 | 17 | 17.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mara Santangelo | Tzipora Obziler | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | 2003 | 1475 | 102.0 | -0.51 | -1.78 | 0.910 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 1490 | 110.4 | -0.81 | -1.76 | 0.806 | 45.2% | +62 | -7 | — | 34.0% | -1.25 | 7–2 (78%) | 1–3 (25%) | 106.8 | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 1478 | 117.0 | +0.72 | -2.40 | 0.822 | 46.9% | +14 | +6 | — | 41.3% | -0.44 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–3 (40%) | 93.3 | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 1658 | 133.7 | +2.27 | -3.42 | 0.945 | 48.9% | -42 | -54 | -60 | 51.7% | +0.10 | 10–10 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 102.7 | -0.61 | 1998 | 1486 | 96.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 26 | 2007 | 1749 | 136.5 | +0.56 | -1.08 | 0.951 | 49.0% | -101 | -32 | -7 | 55.4% | +0.25 | 7–4 (64%) | 8–1 (89%) | 109.8 | -0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 1610 | 108.4 | +0.63 | -4.83 | 0.787 | 45.7% | -32 | +7 | — | 26.9% | -1.31 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.9 | -0.82 | 2000 | 1486 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | — | 41.7% | -1.08 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.58 |
| 28 | 2009 | 1545 | 109.9 | +0.58 | -2.22 | 0.910 | 48.0% | +9 | — | — | 23.8% | -1.71 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1490 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1499 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1488 | 110.6 | -0.17 | -0.61 | 0.945 | 48.6% | +39 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.21 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1511 | 106.2 | +0.96 | -1.81 | 0.924 | 48.2% | +31 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.02 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1587 | 126.6 | -0.19 | -0.25 | 0.896 | 47.0% | +9 | — | — | 59.4% | +0.72 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–0 | — | -0.37 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1617 | 112.4 | -3.24 | -4.08 | 0.780 | 45.1% | +47 | -180 | — | 48.1% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.6 | +1.04 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1518 | 111.9 | -2.36 | -3.89 | 0.718 | 43.0% | +90 | -98 | — | 29.4% | -1.47 | 0–4 (0%) | — | — | -0.31 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1502 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| Career | — | 1824 | 129.5 | +1.04 | -2.38 | 0.915 | 48.3% | -27 | -31 | -28 | 45.2% | -0.34 | 26–28 (48%) | 17–18 (49%) | 103.6 | -2.16 | — | 1630 | 116.0 | -1.89 | -2.96 | 0.804 | 45.4% | +41 | -134 | — | 44.1% | -0.53 | 9–20 (31%) | 8–4 (67%) | 96.7 | +1.63 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 2, 2007 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 17, 2009 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 28, 2009 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 16, 2007 | H2H |
| Dinara Safina | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 12, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Peng | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 28, 2007 | H2H |
| Mariya Koryttseva | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 12, 2008 | H2H |
| Raluca Olaru | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jul 10, 2008 | H2H |
| Aiko Nakamura | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 11, 2008 | H2H |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |