H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marcella Mesker vs Elise Burgin H2H: 3-0
Marcella Mesker holds a 3–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcella Mesker leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcella Mesker won the 1985 Mahwah second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Marcella Mesker | 6-1 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1982* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Marcella Mesker | 7-5 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marcella Mesker | 6-2 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcella Mesker | #394 | #31 | 22 | 1,791 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |