H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Miami Open round of 64 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #2 4-6 6-4 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #48 Match data Mar 25, 2005* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #86 Match data Feb 26, 2005* QF Qatar Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-4 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #170 Match data Aug 31, 2003* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,918 286 230 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,720 0 5 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,829 0 5 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 — — — — — — — 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Kirilenko Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2007 24 17 41 58.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
Career — 203 151 354 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/513 of Maria Kirilenko's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Kirilenko Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 47/54 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
Career — 385/516 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Kirilenko Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -41 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2007 1740 140.8 +3.14 +1.31 1.100 52.1% +5 -194 -199 54.4% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.64 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2008 1725 136.8 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +93 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.04 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2009 1720 129.5 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -218 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.07 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2010 1830 151.8 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -271 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2011 1848 143.7 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% 0 -89 -260 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +18 -110 -42 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2013 1791 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +16 +6 -68 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +12 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
Career — 1919 145.3 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.41 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.