H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-3
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Miami second round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2005* | Doha | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Amélie Mauresmo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 |