H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-2 (incl. walkovers)

Maria Kirilenko vs Iveta Benesova: 2–1 excluding walkovers; 2–2 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Maria Kirilenko leads 2–0 on clay, while Iveta Benesova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2011 Luxembourg round of 16 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 2
4 main-draw results
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Iveta Benesova #53 (w/o) Maria Kirilenko #24 Match data Oct 21, 2011* R16 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Iveta Benesova #60 6-3 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #19 Match data Jan 21, 2011* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Maria Kirilenko #32 6-4 6-2 Iveta Benesova #132 Match data Apr 20, 2008* F Estoril Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Maria Kirilenko #55 6-1 6-2 Iveta Benesova #54 Match data Apr 28, 2005* R32 Warsaw Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,918 286 230 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,762 178 223 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,564 0 0
20 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5 2004 25–20 55.6% #36 1,646 0 1
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,720 0 5 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,610 0 1
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,829 0 5 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,592 0 1
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,521 0 1
25 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5 2008 21–18 53.8% #43 1,652 0 1
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,647 0 1
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,637 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,626 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,579 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Kirilenko Iveta Benesova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2007 24 17 41 58.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 4 5 9 44.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 11 13 24 45.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2008 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 13 15 28 46.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 203 151 354 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — 103 116 219 47.0% 65 79 144 45.1% 5 18 23 21.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Kirilenko Iveta Benesova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -41 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13 2002 1564 116.6 — — — — +44 -100 — 47.4% -0.47 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -0.65
20 2007 1740 140.8 +3.14 +1.31 1.100 52.1% +5 -194 -199 54.4% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.64 2003 1479 107.1 — — — — +105 -55 — 38.2% -0.94 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.1 +0.69
21 2008 1725 136.8 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +93 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.04 2004 1647 128.5 — — — — -23 +14 — 53.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 +0.27
22 2009 1720 129.5 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -218 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.07 2005 1610 122.9 — — — — -28 +68 — 43.2% -0.50 13–9 (59%) 2–7 (22%) 99.0 -0.22
23 2010 1830 151.8 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -271 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69 2006 1592 112.3 — — — — +38 +5 -151 40.9% -0.93 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 -0.26
24 2011 1848 143.7 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% 0 -89 -260 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59 2007 1521 104.5 — — — — +85 -42 — 34.1% -1.25 3–3 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -0.37
25 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +18 -110 -42 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37 2008 1652 126.5 — — — — -4 -18 — 50.5% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 -0.69
26 2013 1791 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +16 +6 -68 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73 2009 1647 132.9 — — — — +22 +22 -131 50.9% +0.18 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 109.1 +1.09
27 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +12 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37 2010 1637 121.1 — — — — +2 +1 — 44.7% -0.61 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.9 +0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1627 135.9 — — — — +26 -37 — 40.2% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 -2.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1579 127.8 — — — — +90 -3 -125 33.9% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -1.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1520 96.7 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +94 — — 0.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.26
Career — 1919 145.3 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.41 — 1763 127.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +22 -6 -135 44.0% -0.47 71–55 (56%) 35–44 (44%) 101.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.