H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Justine Henin H2H: 0-2
Justine Henin holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2006 Berlin fourth round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-0 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| May 5, 2005* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Justine Henin | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |