H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Yuliana Fedak H2H: 1-0
Maria Kirilenko holds a 1–0 lead over Yuliana Fedak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2005 Birmingham second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Maria Kirilenko | 6-3 6-2 | Yuliana Fedak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Yuliana Fedak | #904 | #63 | 498 | 1,584 | 27 | 68 | 28.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Yuliana Fedak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #114 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #80 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #154 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |