H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Zi Yan H2H: 0-1
Zi Yan holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zi Yan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zi Yan won the 2008 Bangalore third round 3-6 7-6(7) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008* | Bangalore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Zi Yan | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-1 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Kirilenko | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |